|
|
 |
Author |
|
| Message | |
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
|
|
|
 |
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 34327
Location: yes
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 18, 15 8:19 am Post subject: |
 
|
no change there then.
never let truth get in the way of power |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 10054
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 19, 15 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
I have sympathy with the farmers, but if there are not bees to pollinate the OSR, it will have an even lower yield. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 23, 15 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
Limited success but not the result we wanted.
If you haven't signed the petitions floating around please do.
The pressure still needs to be applied to stop Liz Truss expanding this next year.
They have ignored large amounts of peer reviewed science, their own scientific advisors & the EU.
David Cameron 2010.
| Quote: |
| "I want this to be the greenest government ever." |
As far as I'm concerned they are not a party of the people or a party for the aspirational but the party of big business.
Calling them consevatives when they have/are opened/opening the environment, our woodland, SSSI's & national parks & greenbelts to abuse & development is as far from conservation as you can get.
I submit they are renamed the PPP.
Profit over People Party. (full of ****). |
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15057
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 23, 15 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
| Tavascarow wrote: |
I submit they are renamed the PPP.
Profit over People Party. (full of ****). |
"PPP" is already an overused acronym, how about:
Profit Above People Party.
Profit Over Ordinary People
Party of Usury and Komplete Excess
Sorry, it's late and I am not firing on all cylinders... and I was never much good at acronyms at the best of times. |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 10054
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 24, 15 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
I did sign the petition, and so did husband. I don't suppose they will listen to us any more than their scientific advisers, but I suppose if they realise that a lot of people are against lifting the ban, they might be a little more careful in limiting where and how neonics can be used. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 24, 15 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
| Mistress Rose wrote: |
| I did sign the petition, and so did husband. I don't suppose they will listen to us any more than their scientific advisers, but I suppose if they realise that a lot of people are against lifting the ban, they might be a little more careful in limiting where and how neonics can be used. |
I'm sure you are right.
The most worrying thing to me now is TTIP because if that goes through, regardless of what a government think or want, corporations like Monsanto will be allowed to sue them for loss of trade. It will be the final act of 'selling England by the pound' to plagiarise a song title.
& our government are supporters of it. Not a surprise to me, but people need to know how much they are giving away.
Hairyloon I like all your choices perhaps we should have a democratic vote?
Whichever one gets 25% is the peoples choice.  |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 10054
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 25, 15 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
I have got letters back from the various MEPs that represent this area, and all but the Green MEP thinks that they can word the treaty so that big corporations can't do that. They think that other treaties have been badly worded. What they don't seem to understand is that some big business is bigger than the EU, and that the government and EUs record of getting wording right so that there is no way a very clever lawyer can wriggle though the gaps is so poor that it would be laughable in other circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 25, 15 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
The question I ask is how does it benefit the UK & the EU.
We already have wide open free trade agreements.
& if it's so beneficial, why all the secret behind closed doors meetings?
Big business has been driving American politics for longer & with more influence than it has here. & I really can't see this as more than the likes of Monsanto, who already have a toe hold with Syngenta (now a Monsanto subsidiary, & neonic manufacurer) bullying their way into Europe. |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 10054
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 26, 15 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
I am inclined to agree with you Tavascarow. Sadly, the politicians see it as a way of opening up trade. They think they can stop poor quality things coming in, big business calling the tune etc. by a properly written treaty. I am afraid I don't think they will be able to, and that some politicians won't want to.
My experience of American business is that they wouldn't know quality control/assurance if it bit them in the face, and that their tactics can be very underhand. I am sure there are plenty of very ethical American businesses, but the ones I have come across have been rather lacking. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 10054
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 27, 15 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
I have signed the petitions and the e-mails I sent to the MEPs were part of that campaign. Hope the powers that be will realise that they do have to face the electorate at some point, and that these campaigns are not just nuisance but real people rather upset about things.
Suppose it is better than the French way where they disrupt transport systems badly and burn things in the streets. Lets hope it has at least if not more effect. |
|
|
|
|
Hairyloon
Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15057
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 34327
Location: yes
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 28, 15 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
39872
im lucky to live in a city in some ways,at least the bees who eat my nectar and pollinate my brambles and beans etc etc are urban and most urban folk dont use much worse than flea splosh on the dog or ant powder for the nasty wee bitey ones we have round here. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 03, 15 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
Oilseed rape yield higher without neonics.
| Quote: |
Matt Shardlow, Buglife's CEO, added: "This is further evidence that neonicotinoids are not essential to maintaining crop yields. While some farmers struggled to establish their oilseed rape crop because the weather last year was ideal for flea beetles, where they have persisted the results have been good."
He adds that the very reason for the improved harvest of oilseed rape - an insect-pollinated crop that provides a rich source of nectar for bees - may be the neonic ban itself, permitting larger and healthier populations of bees and other pollinators:
"We seem to have forgotten that bees and other pollinators are essential to good crop yields. In the trade off this year pollinators may have had a bigger positive effect than any negative impact of flea beetles." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Latest Posts