Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Well worth a read and a listen
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment
Author 
 Message
OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 12:45 pm    Post subject: Well worth a read and a listen Reply with quote
    

This Changes Everything - Naomi Klein.

Well written and articulate argument for governments doing a lot more to combat climate change. She was interviewed on Woman's Hour today too.

Ty Gwyn



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 4563
Location: Lampeter
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Does it,i`m not convinced at all,
Where`s the proof?

The climate has changed several times since the World began,what`s new,
Since i`ve been on the land the weather has been changeable so have the seasons,what`s new.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Watch this programme, it's very interesting and useful to see why so many people have drawn the same conclusions over climate change.

Climate Change by Numbers

OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
Does it,i`m not convinced at all,
Where`s the proof?

The climate has changed several times since the World began,what`s new,
Since i`ve been on the land the weather has been changeable so have the seasons,what`s new.



Of course there are natural climate cycles (due to the variable nature of the earth's orbit over the centuries, etc) but what the scientists are talking about is the change due to us burning millions of tons of fossil fuels and changing the CO2 levels in the atmosphere on top of the natural cycles. This has been measured and is proven beyond doubt.

We'd be crazy to continue pumping more CO2 into the atmosphere.
It doesn't matter if you don't believe it - its happening.

Prove to me it isn't.

vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

OtleyLad wrote:
Prove to me it isn't.
While I agree with you the onus on proof is on those make a claim rather than those denying it. Prove to me there isn't a chocolate tea pot in orbit around the moon.

Back to Ty Gwyn.

The evidence is very clear and the more data we gather the greater becomes the case for demonstrating that man has a profound effect on climate change. What is damaging is not that climate is changing but the rate of change is so fast the evolution cannot keep pace fast enough for the animal kingdom to adapt and survive and species extinction increases at an ever great pace.

Ty Gwyn



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 4563
Location: Lampeter
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

The trouble is,there are a lot of scientists who do not agree with each other,
What about the climate change scientists ship that got stuck in the ice not long back,similar to Mr Scott,
Why is the biggest member of the EU pumping out so much carbon?
Surely its not because they have vast numbers of Wind Turbines so they can balance their carbon books.
Now Japan ,the site of the Kyoto agreement is changing back to coal,no mention of sustainable energy,

And their both advanced countries.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
The trouble is,there are a lot of scientists who do not agree with each other,
What about the climate change scientists ship that got stuck in the ice not long back,similar to Mr Scott,
Why is the biggest member of the EU pumping out so much carbon?
Surely its not because they have vast numbers of Wind Turbines so they can balance their carbon books.
Now Japan ,the site of the Kyoto agreement is changing back to coal,no mention of sustainable energy,

And their both advanced countries.


Have you watched the Climate Change by Numbers programme?

Ty Gwyn



Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 4563
Location: Lampeter
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I watched half of it the other night when you placed the link,must finish watching one night.

OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
The trouble is,there are a lot of scientists who do not agree with each other,
What about the climate change scientists ship that got stuck in the ice not long back,similar to Mr Scott,
Why is the biggest member of the EU pumping out so much carbon?
Surely its not because they have vast numbers of Wind Turbines so they can balance their carbon books.
Now Japan ,the site of the Kyoto agreement is changing back to coal,no mention of sustainable energy,

And their both advanced countries.


The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that humans are accelerating climate change. They are not all in agreement about the rate or the exact consequences. Just because governments still condone buurning of fossil fuels doesn't alter the facts. If we don't change and soon we are all heading for a very rocky future.

OtleyLad



Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2737
Location: Otley, West Yorkshire
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

vegplot wrote:
OtleyLad wrote:
Prove to me it isn't.
While I agree with you the onus on proof is on those make a claim rather than those denying it. Prove to me there isn't a chocolate tea pot in orbit around the moon.



Thats like wanting me to prove the earth is round when its already common knowledge. Its the 21st century and there is no need to prove climate change.

vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
The trouble is,there are a lot of scientists who do not agree with each other,


Really?

Ty Gwyn wrote:
What about the climate change scientists ship that got stuck in the ice not long back,similar to Mr Scott,


What about it? Are you suggesting that because there of climate change we shouldn't have ice? Climate change is about trends not fluctuations.

Ty Gwyn wrote:

Why is the biggest member of the EU pumping out so much carbon?
Surely its not because they have vast numbers of Wind Turbines so they can balance their carbon books.


Because they're the power house of Europe perhaps?

Ty Gwyn wrote:

Now Japan ,the site of the Kyoto agreement is changing back to coal,no mention of sustainable energy,


"A lack of locations with constant wind, environmental restrictions, and emphasis by power utilities on fossil and nuclear power hinders the employment of more wind power in the country".

No mention of sustainable energy? Where do you get your information from? A very quick search show Japan is investing in renewables but is hindered by industry. Don't forget Japan has relatively weak governance.

vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

OtleyLad wrote:
vegplot wrote:
OtleyLad wrote:
Prove to me it isn't.
While I agree with you the onus on proof is on those make a claim rather than those denying it. Prove to me there isn't a chocolate tea pot in orbit around the moon.



Thats like wanting me to prove the earth is round when its already common knowledge. Its the 21st century and there is no need to prove climate change.


You miss the point. The assertion is plainly ridiculous and it's futile to try and prove it wrong. The claimant has to prove their case beyond reasonable double. You asked Ty Gwyn to prove something isn't so. Is that not just as futile?

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
I watched half of it the other night when you placed the link,must finish watching one night.


It answers most questions about it. The change is definitely happening, and there's certainly no harm in reducing our extraction of carbon while we work out how to perfect carbon capture. Come the day we do perfect it, the coal, oil & gas will still be there.

jamanda
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 35056
Location: Devon
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Ty Gwyn wrote:
The trouble is,there are a lot of scientists who do not agree with each other,
What about the climate change scientists ship that got stuck in the ice not long back,similar to Mr Scott,
Why is the biggest member of the EU pumping out so much carbon?
Surely its not because they have vast numbers of Wind Turbines so they can balance their carbon books.
Now Japan ,the site of the Kyoto agreement is changing back to coal,no mention of sustainable energy,

And their both advanced countries.


97% of scientists do agree with each other. Scientists are not the politicians who make the decisions.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Graham Hyde



Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Posts: 365

PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 15 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

The current climate is not the normal for planet earth.
We are actually still emerging from an ice age.
Fact.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment All times are GMT
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com