Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
Is this true?
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Poultry
Author 
 Message
Jools



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 1028
Location: South Wales
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 12:22 pm    Post subject: Is this true? Reply with quote
    

Quote:
Because of current government guidelines the birds, who currently live at Betty's Farm, in Willington, can only live until the end of August.

The farm’s office manager, Becky Brooks, explained the situation to the Burton Mail:

"The DEFRA standards do not allow us to keep the birds past 72 weeks, so at that point we either sell them or they go off to chicken heaven and become part of the food cycle.

"As the bird gets older the quality diminishes so DEFRA tell us to do it early to ensure the quality of all the eggs remains the same.

https://quirker.co.uk/story/how-you-can-take-part-in-the-great-chicken-rescue

I've not heard of that rule before. It was my understanding that the birds were sold/slaughtered at that age because egg production started slowing down and wasn't economically viable.

If it is true, what does this mean to those who adopt these girls and sell their surplus eggs at the gate/to friends/family?

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45377
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

id not heard of the defra standard but 72 weeks would be an old bird in a battery or barn egg unit.

chances are they dont look like the ones in the photo

£2 a bird is somewhat more than the prole and petfood trade would pay.at point of collection they are often free ,if they have had a bit of tlc for a few weeks a charge would be appropriate.

if you want say five getting ten is probably sensible ,there will be a few who dont thrive (or lay well but make soup)

with older birds a couple of eggs a week is probably a good average laying rate in summer ,less in winter,so work from that as to how many one requires.

replace some every year if you want a constant flock

the dirty four dozen were quite educational in such matters

Tavascarow



Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

It's got bugger all to do with DEFRA just the industry standard.
They are 20 to 26 weeks before they start laying & they keep them for about 50 weeks.
Egg quality does suffer after that but only shell, size & numbers.
It's pure economics not government regulation & they are deflecting that by trying to blame a non existent regulation.

vegplot



Joined: 19 Apr 2007
Posts: 21301
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Unlikely. There's no evidence to suggest there is a chicken heaven

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45377
Location: yes
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

there is ,it is called a chookmobile,however it is hell for the wildlife

Bodger



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 13524

PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 15 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Never known a chicken to come with a birth certificate or an ID card.

Jools



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 1028
Location: South Wales
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 15 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Tavascarow wrote:
It's got bugger all to do with DEFRA just the industry standard.
They are 20 to 26 weeks before they start laying & they keep them for about 50 weeks.
Egg quality does suffer after that but only shell, size & numbers.
It's pure economics not government regulation & they are deflecting that by trying to blame a non existent regulation.


That's what I thought. Trying to make themselves sound good, I guess.

I'm not looking for more chickens myself, but it popped up in my Twitter feed and as I'd never heard of that Defra ruling, thought I'd ask here.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Having been interviewed by newspapers before and finding what I was quoted as saying and what I actually said to be two different things, I think it best if you contact them directly to confirm this information.

Jools



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 1028
Location: South Wales
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

It's now made the news on the Beeb.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-33457704

Nicky cigreen



Joined: 25 Jun 2007
Posts: 9702
Location: Devon, uk
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Jools wrote:
It's now made the news on the Beeb.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-33457704


no mention of Defra in the beeb article.

Jools



Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 1028
Location: South Wales
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

No, the Beeb article says that it's because of the packing plant.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I do wonder how often 'regulations' are blamed for things that are a consumer issue.

Tavascarow



Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rob R wrote:
I do wonder how often 'regulations' are blamed for things that are a consumer issue.

The consumers buy what they are given. extra large misshaped eggs would sell like hot cakes if they where presented. But the supermarkets want a uniform product that stacks neatly on the shelf.
They are still blaming 'rules' but saying industry not DEFRA.
There is nothing stopping them keeping the birds till they drop dead from exhaustion AFAIA other than economics.
This is just a ploy to get sympathy in order to offload the birds & it seems to have worked.

Rob R



Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 31902
Location: York
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Tavascarow wrote:
Rob R wrote:
I do wonder how often 'regulations' are blamed for things that are a consumer issue.

The consumers buy what they are given. extra large misshaped eggs would sell like hot cakes if they where presented. But the supermarkets want a uniform product that stacks neatly on the shelf.
They are still blaming 'rules' but saying industry not DEFRA.
There is nothing stopping them keeping the birds till they drop dead from exhaustion AFAIA other than economics.


What a load of absolute rubbish - I have been doing this job long enough to know that this scenario only exists on River Cottage. Supermarkets are the masters of providing people with what they want, when they want it, and that includes eggs that aren't broken when you get them home. If it was a simple as offering something and people would buy it then they wouldn't do it.

Tavascarow wrote:
This is just a ploy to get sympathy in order to offload the birds & it seems to have worked.


Yep.

Tavascarow



Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Posts: 8407
Location: South Cornwall
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 15 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rob R wrote:
Tavascarow wrote:
Rob R wrote:
I do wonder how often 'regulations' are blamed for things that are a consumer issue.

The consumers buy what they are given. extra large misshaped eggs would sell like hot cakes if they where presented. But the supermarkets want a uniform product that stacks neatly on the shelf.
They are still blaming 'rules' but saying industry not DEFRA.
There is nothing stopping them keeping the birds till they drop dead from exhaustion AFAIA other than economics.


What a load of absolute rubbish - I have been doing this job long enough to know that this scenario only exists on River Cottage. Supermarkets are the masters of providing people with what they want, when they want it, and that includes eggs that aren't broken when you get them home. If it was a simple as offering something and people would buy it then they wouldn't do it.

Tavascarow wrote:
This is just a ploy to get sympathy in order to offload the birds & it seems to have worked.


Yep.

Chicken & egg Rob. An egg farmer here in Cornwall can't sell his extra large eggs because they don't fit in the standard size egg boxes. He sells them by the tray to locals & they sell fast. It's the supermarkets that don't want them not the consumers.
If supermarkets sold the misshaped eggs as novelty they would sell at a premium.
The only ones they can't sell by law are the broken & soft shells which have always gone to the liquid egg market for processed foods.
& obviously as birds get older they lay more of those.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Poultry All times are GMT
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com