Home Page
   Articles
       links
About Us    
Traders        
Recipes            
Latest Articles
good news cos they build watersheds
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment
Author 
 Message
dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45377
Location: yes
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 15 5:55 pm    Post subject: good news cos they build watersheds Reply with quote
    

beaver photos included



i can think of several places where they would be good river management,increase biodiversity and if they become too numerous to "emigrate"to new places that need them they do make a nice stew and a hat

the ea spend millions of flood management ,these critters work for twigs

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15539

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

In the New Forest they have been working for some years to slow down the streams and allow snags, pools and the mires to redevelop, so in some ways, beavers there might also be a good idea. Not sure what the fish stocks are like in the Forest though.

I can see there could be problems if there were young plantations near the river, and that they will have an effect of the fish stocks and possibly fish migration, although I would have thought fish could get over or through the dams.

With proper management I don't see why it shouldn't work.

robkb



Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 4205
Location: SE London
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 8:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

I like the arrogance of them being 'permitted' to stay

Bodger



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 13524

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

If I lived in Ottery St Mary, I'd already be thinking about doing guided beaver tours. The presence of beavers could be a boon to the tourist sector, if its managed sympathetically of course.

sean
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 42207
Location: North Devon
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

They could change its name to Beavery St Mary.

Treacodactyl
Downsizer Moderator


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 25795
Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

robkb wrote:
I like the arrogance of them being 'permitted' to stay


Why do you say that?

There's a system in place if you wish to release animals and for good reason. No one knows where they come and the tape worm they can carry can cause death in various animals such as humans and dogs. They could also carry other diseases such as rabies.

I gather they don't even know yet if they are Eurasian beavers so it's not even confirmed if this is a reintroduction or the introduction of a new species.

They do cause a large amount of damage so if they spread small scale land users particularly will have to either put up with a large loss of trees or fence. Fencing is not ideal as it is not only costly but isn't great for other wildlife and can even lead to deaths.

At the beavers don't seem to be a problem (assuming they're disease free) as they are on a large, traditional estate (the sort many seem to want broken up).

Hopefully common sense will carry on prevailing and sensible action will be taken if they cause too much damage in future. There will also need to be action to ensure a healthy population as currently they are just going to inbreed.

robkb



Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 4205
Location: SE London
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 15 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Thanks for that.

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15539

PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 15 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Good post Treacodactyl. I agree that if the beavers are found to be Eurasian and disease and parasite free they may be an asset, but only if they are kept under control in numbers and monitored to make sure they are keeping healthy.

Introduced species, like grey squirrels for instance, can completely destroy native species like the red squirrel by competing for food, carrying disease, and even sometimes attacking the native species. I got a petition from someone who objected to the Forestry Commission offering grants for grey squirrel control. Sadly there was no way I could let the person posting it know they are perhaps a little misguided. I rather suspect that if a branch fell on them because it had been damaged by a squirrel, they would be demanding the land owner 'did something about it'. I have seen the whole top of a tree dead because of ring barking by squirrels for instance.

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45377
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 15 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

introduced species ? native species ?

for example it isnt that long ago what is now the uk had "native polar bears"eating the seals we still have and apart from arctic char in a few lakes most of the non salty fish we have now would not be "native" pre recent melt.

our "native" lions and hippos dont seem to be thriving although they were doing fine when the mud under traffy square was deposited.

any environment that suits a critter is it's natural habitat if it arrives there .

the non native ukippy stuff applies even less to critters than it does to people

ps the seals had to adapt a bit to the "heatwave"

the arucaria forests are gone as are most of the more recent ones based on pine or broadleaf

the forign rhinos and pandas are redundant in evolutionary terms as their habitats are gone but rats and pigeons have plenty of scope to thrive and adapt in the urban landscapes

my point is there is no such thing as a good or native species ,there are effective species for any environment (some are good at geoengineering to human advantage as a bonus)

ideas such as rats on an island are "bad"and the incumbent birds are "good"misses the point , there has been and will be a succession of life forms that exist or at times become dominant in environments which change for a variety of reasons .

ps bio diversity on a local or global stage comes from an odd combination of stability ,stress ,mobility and isolation.

Falstaff



Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 1014

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 15 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

dpack wrote:
introduced species ? native species ?

for example it isnt that long ago what is now the uk had "native polar bears"eating the seals we still have and apart from arctic char in a few lakes most of the non salty fish we have now would not be "native" pre recent melt.

our "native" lions and hippos dont seem to be thriving although they were doing fine when the mud under traffy square was deposited.

any environment that suits a critter is it's natural habitat if it arrives there .

the non native ukippy stuff applies even less to critters than it does to people

ps the seals had to adapt a bit to the "heatwave"

the arucaria forests are gone as are most of the more recent ones based on pine or broadleaf

the forign rhinos and pandas are redundant in evolutionary terms as their habitats are gone but rats and pigeons have plenty of scope to thrive and adapt in the urban landscapes

my point is there is no such thing as a good or native species ,there are effective species for any environment (some are good at geoengineering to human advantage as a bonus)

ideas such as rats on an island are "bad"and the incumbent birds are "good"misses the point , there has been and will be a succession of life forms that exist or at times become dominant in environments which change for a variety of reasons .

ps bio diversity on a local or global stage comes from an odd combination of stability ,stress ,mobility and isolation.


I can't say fairer than I agree with that

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15539

PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 15 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Sorry Dpack but I can't agree. If you allow dominant alien species without the predators that exist in their native environment, you end up with a complete lack of biodiversity. Think of the effect mink have on everything they come across. Would you like a country dominated by mink and rats? I certainly wouldn't.

Yes, the climate has changed dramatically over geological time in what is now the UK, so dinosaurs, elephants, polar bears, who cannot co-exist anyway are extinct here. Some things like panda, which are vegetarian bears, are something of an evolutionary enigma. Whether they are a 'trying it to see if it works' or a 'path to be followed' in evolutionary terms is anyones guess as our understanding is incomplete and timescales of study too short.

gregotyn



Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 2201
Location: Llanfyllin area
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 15 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Not wanting to argue with anyone, just to ask is the badger a native species?
I come from the school of thought that the best badgers are dead badgers. When I found a cub out of its sett I contacted the badger rescue in Ruthin; the cub did not ask to be born, but they the rescue people said it was too far to come, and the Shropshire gang, who I first contacted, wouldn't come as it was not on their patch. The Ruthin lot did ring up 4 days after I rang to ask how it was, but I explained that all animals, badgers included, don't live long without food!

dpack



Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 45377
Location: yes
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 15 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

beaver facts

ps badgers are a post last melt uk species about 10000yrs or so like most "native "species

Mistress Rose



Joined: 21 Jul 2011
Posts: 15539

PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 15 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Rather sad Nick. I agree with Dpack that they are native.

Has anything further been done about the beavers in Devon? I see from the article that permission has been obtained for them to stay subject to tests, but do these need to wait until spring? I know that beavers tend to retreat mainly to their lodges in the winter, but don't know if they stay there all the time in the UK.

Nick



Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford
PostPosted: Sat Feb 14, 15 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
    

Moi?

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment All times are GMT
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3
View Latest Posts View Latest Posts

 

Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
Copyright © 2004 marsjupiter.com