|
|
 |
Author |
|
Message |  |
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4632 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
 |
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 16507
|
|
|
|
 |
gz
Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 9243 Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
|
|
|
|
 |
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 44397 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
 |
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4632 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
 |
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4632 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
 |
Nicky cigreen
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 9967 Location: Devon, uk
|
|
|
|
 |
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 44397 Location: yes
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 25 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
re usa vs uk properties, both are very varied , the variations are from age , design, price band, etc
outside cities the us ones tend to have more space
re low energy input in the uk, i worked next to and on a scandahaus in the 1980's
in winter a few twigs took it from cool and unoccupied for 5 days to warm in 20 mins, triple insulated, heat exchange chimney, ducted warm air heating for background etc
plenty of space for PV for that one, and it is in a hundred acre wood
i have also known uk houses that are only cosy if you burn a 1/2cwt of coal a week they were built for that
in the us outside of cities there is a lot more scope for carbon reduced energy than in cities or in most uk rural properties |
|
|
|
 |
Slim
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Posts: 6709 Location: New England (In the US of A)
|
|
|
|
 |
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 16507
|
|
|
|
 |
gz
Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 9243 Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
|
|
|
|
 |
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 16507
|
|
|
|
 |
gz
Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 9243 Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
|
|
|
|
 |
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 44397 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
 |
Nicky cigreen
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 9967 Location: Devon, uk
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|